Global Assessment of Radio Navigation Aid Networks and Their Contribution to Performance-Based Navigation Implementation

@Article{eng6120360, AUTHOR = {Ostroumov, Ivan and Kuzmenko, Nataliia and Zaliskyi, Maksym}, TITLE = {Global Assessment of Radio Navigation Aid Networks and Their Contribution to Performance-Based Navigation Implementation}, JOURNAL = {Eng}, VOLUME = {6}, YEAR = {2025}, NUMBER = {12}, ARTICLE-NUMBER = {360}, URL = {https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4117/6/12/360}, ISSN = {2673-4117}, ABSTRACT = {Throughout the history of civil aviation, radio navigation aids have played a crucial role in ensuring the safety and continuity of air transportation. Although the development of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) over the past half-century has significantly improved positioning accuracy, the system’s vulnerability to interference considerably reduces its reliability and poses a risk to civil aviation safety. This limitation highlights the crucial role of ground-based radio navigation networks in ensuring nominal flight operations. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the global coverage and performance of radio navigation aid networks and assesses the implementation level of Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) by Air Navigation Service Providers (ANSPs) worldwide. A novel methodology is proposed for network performance evaluation, incorporating spatial characteristics of parameter distribution across global airspace using a geospatial indexing framework to determine airspace configurations compliant with various area navigation (RNAV) specifications. The performance of DME/DME, VOR/DME, and VOR/VOR positioning methods is evaluated within the official ICAO regional airspace structure. The results indicate that the European and North American regions currently maintain the most developed DME and VOR networks and propose reliable infrastructure sustainability. Globally, RNAV 1 capability is supported within approximately 20.2% of airspace using DME/DME and 3.45% using VOR/DME, while RNAV 5 coverage extends over 23.61% of global airspace, which approves resource efficiency distribution. RNAV 10 coverage could be supported by the VOR/VOR positioning method only in 13.48% of global airspace. Overall, the obtained results confirm the limited positioning performance of VOR network compared with DME, supporting the continuation of VOR network rationalization strategies and highlighting the need for optimized resource sharing to ensure the resilience and safety of the global air navigation system.}, DOI = {10.3390/eng6120360} }